Policy and contract Q&A
A focused Q&A assistant grounded specifically on the firm's policies, contracts, and compliance documentation. Answers questions like 'what are our payment terms with vendor X', 'what's our PTO policy', 'what does our MSA say about IP'. Different from C7 (general knowledge search) in that it's tuned for the precision and citation discipline that policy and contract questions require: every answer must cite the specific clause, with the exact text visible. The pattern's value is taking the 'I have to ask legal' and 'I have to read the contract' load off the team.
Requirements describe capabilities the pattern needs in your environment, not the vendors you must buy. Any system that fills a requirement satisfies it — that’s what makes the catalog portable across the long tail of SMB tooling.
policy_contract_corpusThe authoritative document collection. Policy documents, signed contracts, addenda, amendments. Every word matters.
- contract management system
- internal policy library with version control
- structured legal document store
- shared drive with organized policy and contract folders
user_query_surfaceWhere people ask questions about policies and contracts.
- chat interface in the contract management system
- chat bot for policy questions
- search bar in the firm portal
permission_resolverDetermines which documents the user is allowed to query. Contracts especially have tight access controls.
- permission groups in the contract management system
- role-based access in the policy library
- explicit allowlists for sensitive contracts
citation_destinationWhere the answer goes back, with citations that show the exact source text. The citation is non-negotiable for this pattern.
- answer panel with collapsible source quotations
- chat reply with citations as links
- structured response with clause-by-clause source
legal_escalation_routeQuestions the pattern shouldn't answer alone (interpreting clauses in dispute, novel legal questions, anything touching litigation) get routed to legal.
- ticket created for the legal team
- DM to the firm's general counsel or external lawyer
- queue in the legal workflow system
- 01User asks a question through the query surface
user_query_surface - 02Resolve user permissions against the policy/contract corpus
permission_resolver - 03Classify the question: factual lookup, interpretive judgment, or novel legal question
- 04For interpretive or novel questions, route to legal escalation immediately
legal_escalation_routeDECISION Pattern only answers factual lookups. - 05Search the permissioned corpus for the relevant clauses
policy_contract_corpus - 06Compose an answer with inline citations: each claim must quote the source clause with full context available on hover or click
- 07If no clear answer is found, say so explicitly and offer to route to legalDECISION Honest 'no clear answer' is mandatory; this pattern must never hedge.
- 08Deliver the answer with citations to the user
citation_destination
Structured outputs this pattern produces. Other patterns and client systems can subscribe to them, which is how the catalog composes over time.
policy_question_signalWhat the team asks about policies and contracts, aggregated.
- policy team understanding what's unclear
- training and communications priorities
- contract templating decisions
legal_escalation_volumeHow often the pattern correctly escalates and how often a human had to override its answer.
- legal team capacity planning
- pattern quality dashboards
contract_search_signalWhich contracts get queried most, useful for renewal prioritization and template improvement.
- legal operations
- contract template review cycles